<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1068 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act were not justified. The assessees had voluntarily filed their returns before any notice was issued, and their returns were accepted without additions. The Tribunal held that the penalties were not warranted, the CIT(A) erred in confirming them, and Explanation 3 to Section 18(1)(c) did not apply. Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1068 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act were not justified. The assessees had voluntarily filed their returns before any notice was issued, and their returns were accepted without additions. The Tribunal held that the penalties were not warranted, the CIT(A) erred in confirming them, and Explanation 3 to Section 18(1)(c) did not apply. Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>