https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271272 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. The Court directed the appellant to make an additional deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 and modified the pre-deposit terms, allowing the appeal to be heard on its merits promptly. The Court emphasized the appellant's claim of undue hardship and availability of CENVAT credit, finding the Tribunal's dismissal unjustified. This decision enabled the Tribunal to proceed with the substantive consideration of the appeal efficiently. en-us Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 May 2016 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271272 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. The Court directed the appellant to make an additional deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 and modified the pre-deposit terms, allowing the appeal to be heard on its merits promptly. The Court emphasized the appellant's claim of undue hardship and availability of CENVAT credit, finding the Tribunal's dismissal unjustified. This decision enabled the Tribunal to proceed with the substantive consideration of the appeal efficiently. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271272