<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application for rectification, noting errors in the Final Order concerning eligibility for Cenvat Credit on insurance services, taxi services, and vehicle repair and maintenance. The Tribunal acknowledged the presence of undisputed facts in the records supporting the appellant&#039;s claims, emphasizing that evidence was not required for established facts. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to address the plea and submissions on the ground of limitation was deemed a crucial error. Consequently, the Final Order was recalled, and the appeal was restored for final hearing to address the identified issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application for rectification, noting errors in the Final Order concerning eligibility for Cenvat Credit on insurance services, taxi services, and vehicle repair and maintenance. The Tribunal acknowledged the presence of undisputed facts in the records supporting the appellant&#039;s claims, emphasizing that evidence was not required for established facts. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to address the plea and submissions on the ground of limitation was deemed a crucial error. Consequently, the Final Order was recalled, and the appeal was restored for final hearing to address the identified issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>