<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1043 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271251</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of eviction orders issued by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, finding them compliant with due process. It deemed the petitioners&#039; unregistered lease agreements invalid under relevant laws, rendering them unable to challenge the eviction under the SARFAESI Act. Additionally, the court ruled that the petitioners lacked standing and had an alternative remedy through the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1043 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271251</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of eviction orders issued by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, finding them compliant with due process. It deemed the petitioners&#039; unregistered lease agreements invalid under relevant laws, rendering them unable to challenge the eviction under the SARFAESI Act. Additionally, the court ruled that the petitioners lacked standing and had an alternative remedy through the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>