<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1037 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271245</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeals was condoned, allowing the matters to be heard on merits. Applying the limited scope of appellate review in customs and excise disputes, the SC found no good ground to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s concurrent findings and declined to reappraise the evidence or disturb the orders under challenge. The civil appeals were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1037 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271245</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeals was condoned, allowing the matters to be heard on merits. Applying the limited scope of appellate review in customs and excise disputes, the SC found no good ground to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s concurrent findings and declined to reappraise the evidence or disturb the orders under challenge. The civil appeals were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>