<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 963 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and upholding the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal also remanded the cross-objection raised by the assessee regarding the applicability of Section 194C to individuals for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to the legislative intent and judicial precedents in interpreting tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 963 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and upholding the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal also remanded the cross-objection raised by the assessee regarding the applicability of Section 194C to individuals for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to the legislative intent and judicial precedents in interpreting tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>