<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 124 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2110</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the adjustment of excess cash payment against the short payment made from the credit account, directing the assistant commissioner to permit this adjustment. The decision emphasized the importance of correctly utilizing service tax credit and compliance with payment percentages, ultimately leading to the rejection of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 124 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2110</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the adjustment of excess cash payment against the short payment made from the credit account, directing the assistant commissioner to permit this adjustment. The decision emphasized the importance of correctly utilizing service tax credit and compliance with payment percentages, ultimately leading to the rejection of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>