<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 85 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178233</link>
    <description>Entitlement to deduct interest was determined by whether the interest was incurred on capital borrowed and actually applied to the partnership business; because the assessee&#039;s borrowings were debited and used as capital, the interest satisfied the statutory business nexus and was allowed. By contrast, audit fees and stationery incurred for ascertaining the firm&#039;s income or preparing the individual&#039;s assessment were treated as either firm-level expenditures or personal expenses and therefore could not be claimed again by the partner; those items were disallowed. The appeal was allowed in part on these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 85 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178233</link>
      <description>Entitlement to deduct interest was determined by whether the interest was incurred on capital borrowed and actually applied to the partnership business; because the assessee&#039;s borrowings were debited and used as capital, the interest satisfied the statutory business nexus and was allowed. By contrast, audit fees and stationery incurred for ascertaining the firm&#039;s income or preparing the individual&#039;s assessment were treated as either firm-level expenditures or personal expenses and therefore could not be claimed again by the partner; those items were disallowed. The appeal was allowed in part on these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>