<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 668 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on key issues, including the accrual date of commission income and advertisement expenses, affirming that income accrues upon payment receipt and that expenses benefiting third parties can still serve business purposes. It remitted issues regarding disallowance u/s 43B, bad debts, motor car depreciation, and deduction u/s 80HHC to the AO for further verification and adjudication, emphasizing compliance with legal standards and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 668 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on key issues, including the accrual date of commission income and advertisement expenses, affirming that income accrues upon payment receipt and that expenses benefiting third parties can still serve business purposes. It remitted issues regarding disallowance u/s 43B, bad debts, motor car depreciation, and deduction u/s 80HHC to the AO for further verification and adjudication, emphasizing compliance with legal standards and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>