<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1101 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178223</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 provides a self-contained mechanism for registration of a public trust, inquiry into trust property, determination of succession, correction of entries, management, audit and appeals. On that scheme, disputes over the nature of trust property, succession to the office of Mahant and related management issues were matters for the statutory authorities, including the Assistant Commissioner, who had competence to inquire into them. The Supreme Court therefore approved the High Court&#039;s decision to relegate the parties to the statutory forum rather than decide those controversies in public interest jurisdiction. The Court also declined interference with the treatment of a separate writ petition as infructuous and with any direction for continued committee management.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1101 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178223</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 provides a self-contained mechanism for registration of a public trust, inquiry into trust property, determination of succession, correction of entries, management, audit and appeals. On that scheme, disputes over the nature of trust property, succession to the office of Mahant and related management issues were matters for the statutory authorities, including the Assistant Commissioner, who had competence to inquire into them. The Supreme Court therefore approved the High Court&#039;s decision to relegate the parties to the statutory forum rather than decide those controversies in public interest jurisdiction. The Court also declined interference with the treatment of a separate writ petition as infructuous and with any direction for continued committee management.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>