<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1102 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178229</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee is not a primary co-operative bank as it did not meet all the conditions outlined in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Consequently, the assessee remains eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and Section 80P(4) does not apply. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant the deduction to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1102 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178229</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee is not a primary co-operative bank as it did not meet all the conditions outlined in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Consequently, the assessee remains eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and Section 80P(4) does not apply. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant the deduction to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>