https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2106 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order rejecting the refund claims for service tax paid by the appellants, citing their obligation to pay taxes on behalf of the foreign Consultant as per the agreement. The Tribunal dismissed the appellants' reliance on a previous case, stating the facts were not similar. The decision was based on previous Tribunal rulings in similar cases, such as Jindal Steel and Vikram Cement, where similar issues were settled. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the rejection of the refund claims. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2106 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order rejecting the refund claims for service tax paid by the appellants, citing their obligation to pay taxes on behalf of the foreign Consultant as per the agreement. The Tribunal dismissed the appellants' reliance on a previous case, stating the facts were not similar. The decision was based on previous Tribunal rulings in similar cases, such as Jindal Steel and Vikram Cement, where similar issues were settled. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the rejection of the refund claims. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2106