<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 45 -  CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2105</link>
    <description>The service tax dispute turned on whether an audit report produced by the appellant had to be considered before confirming demand and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant relied on a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and the later audit report to contend that service tax had been paid on subsequent receipts and that no demand survived. Because the audit report was not before the original adjudicating authority, it required examination at the adjudication stage. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh adjudication after considering the audit report and granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 45 -  CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2105</link>
      <description>The service tax dispute turned on whether an audit report produced by the appellant had to be considered before confirming demand and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant relied on a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and the later audit report to contend that service tax had been paid on subsequent receipts and that no demand survived. Because the audit report was not before the original adjudicating authority, it required examination at the adjudication stage. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh adjudication after considering the audit report and granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>