<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1029 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, canceling the addition of Rs. 14,00,000 as income from other sources. The Tribunal disagreed with the Ld. CIT(A) and held that the amount should be taxed on a receipt basis, not under the percentage of completion method. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the jurisdictional challenge to the assessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A, as the primary issue was resolved in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1029 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, canceling the addition of Rs. 14,00,000 as income from other sources. The Tribunal disagreed with the Ld. CIT(A) and held that the amount should be taxed on a receipt basis, not under the percentage of completion method. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the jurisdictional challenge to the assessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A, as the primary issue was resolved in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>