<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1026 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271234</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, deleted the demand under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, and upheld relief for the assessee. The ITAT found the levy of fees under section 234E before June 1, 2015, was unsustainable in law, citing amendments to section 200A. Relying on judicial precedents, the ITAT concluded the levy was impermissible pre-amendment and directed the Assessing Officer to remove the late filing fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:15:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1026 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271234</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, deleted the demand under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, and upheld relief for the assessee. The ITAT found the levy of fees under section 234E before June 1, 2015, was unsustainable in law, citing amendments to section 200A. Relying on judicial precedents, the ITAT concluded the levy was impermissible pre-amendment and directed the Assessing Officer to remove the late filing fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>