<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1018 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271226</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee, canceling penalties imposed for the assessment years in question. The decision was based on procedural defects in penalty notices and the authorities&#039; failure to specify grounds clearly. The tribunal emphasized the importance of specific and clear penalty notices to uphold natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1018 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271226</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee, canceling penalties imposed for the assessment years in question. The decision was based on procedural defects in penalty notices and the authorities&#039; failure to specify grounds clearly. The tribunal emphasized the importance of specific and clear penalty notices to uphold natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>