<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1006 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271214</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the special leave petition and then dismissed it. The text provides no further reasoning, legal principle, or substantive determination on the excise dispute, so the operative effect is limited to the procedural disposal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1006 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271214</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the special leave petition and then dismissed it. The text provides no further reasoning, legal principle, or substantive determination on the excise dispute, so the operative effect is limited to the procedural disposal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>