https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271213 The SC applied the ratio of earlier binding decisions and held that the disputed question was already squarely covered by its precedents in Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Detergents India Limited and Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad v. Goodyear South Asia Tyres Pvt. Ltd. No fresh distinction or ground to reopen the issue was found, so the established legal position in those judgments governed the matter. The appeals were therefore dismissed in view of binding precedent. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271213 The SC applied the ratio of earlier binding decisions and held that the disputed question was already squarely covered by its precedents in Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Detergents India Limited and Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad v. Goodyear South Asia Tyres Pvt. Ltd. No fresh distinction or ground to reopen the issue was found, so the established legal position in those judgments governed the matter. The appeals were therefore dismissed in view of binding precedent. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271213