https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271211 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confiscating goods valued at Rs. 12,93,50,999.40, and ordering recovery of central excise drawback of Rs. 88,18,084, along with penalties on the appellants. It found in favor of the appellants, citing precedents like Kultar Export, holding that central excise drawback was admissible even when goods were procured from the open market. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was not sustainable, allowing the appeals and ruling in favor of the appellants based on established legal principles and precedents. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:11:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271211 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confiscating goods valued at Rs. 12,93,50,999.40, and ordering recovery of central excise drawback of Rs. 88,18,084, along with penalties on the appellants. It found in favor of the appellants, citing precedents like Kultar Export, holding that central excise drawback was admissible even when goods were procured from the open market. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was not sustainable, allowing the appeals and ruling in favor of the appellants based on established legal principles and precedents. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271211