<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 120 -  HIGH COURT, KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2096</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision that profits for deductions under section 80HHD should be computed for the business as a whole, not unit-wise. The appellant&#039;s argument, citing judicial precedents for unit-wise assessments, was rejected. The court emphasized that the legislative intent was to calculate deductions based on the entire business income of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 120 -  HIGH COURT, KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2096</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision that profits for deductions under section 80HHD should be computed for the business as a whole, not unit-wise. The appellant&#039;s argument, citing judicial precedents for unit-wise assessments, was rejected. The court emphasized that the legislative intent was to calculate deductions based on the entire business income of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>