<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 995 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271203</link>
    <description>The Court granted sanction for the Scheme of Arrangement involving Demerger and transfer of a division between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Dispensation of meetings for Equity Shareholders and Creditors was allowed. Notices were issued to the Regional Director, and publication requirements were met. After addressing observations from the Regional Director regarding tax compliance, the Court approved the Scheme, imposed costs, and directed necessary actions for implementation, ultimately disposing of the petitions. The judgment underscores compliance with statutory procedures and Court approval for such arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 995 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271203</link>
      <description>The Court granted sanction for the Scheme of Arrangement involving Demerger and transfer of a division between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Dispensation of meetings for Equity Shareholders and Creditors was allowed. Notices were issued to the Regional Director, and publication requirements were met. After addressing observations from the Regional Director regarding tax compliance, the Court approved the Scheme, imposed costs, and directed necessary actions for implementation, ultimately disposing of the petitions. The judgment underscores compliance with statutory procedures and Court approval for such arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>