<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1031 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction u/s 80IB for the first unit. It emphasized that a withdrawn claim in a revised return can still be considered if conditions for the deduction are met, especially if directed by the appellate authority. The Tribunal highlighted the need to assess claims based on facts and legal provisions, even if initially withdrawn, as long as eligibility criteria are fulfilled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1031 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction u/s 80IB for the first unit. It emphasized that a withdrawn claim in a revised return can still be considered if conditions for the deduction are met, especially if directed by the appellate authority. The Tribunal highlighted the need to assess claims based on facts and legal provisions, even if initially withdrawn, as long as eligibility criteria are fulfilled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>