https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178183 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in exercising its power under Article 226 to award compensation in cases involving disputed facts and negligence. The Court emphasized that negligence must be proven and such matters should be resolved in civil courts, not through writ petitions. The impugned judgments were set aside, but amounts already paid to the respondents were not to be recovered. The civil appeals were disposed of without costs. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:28:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178183 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in exercising its power under Article 226 to award compensation in cases involving disputed facts and negligence. The Court emphasized that negligence must be proven and such matters should be resolved in civil courts, not through writ petitions. The impugned judgments were set aside, but amounts already paid to the respondents were not to be recovered. The civil appeals were disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178183