https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178171 Occupancy tenants are treated as entitled to compensation against the zamindar in land acquisition matters, and the note applies that precedent to reject the contrary State argument. It also explains that a claimant need not state a separate amount for each sub-head of compensation in a Section 9 objection, so omission of itemwise figures does not prevent an award. The discussion further notes that a claim may be pursued through Section 18 proceedings and that Section 25(3) supports compensation for fixtures, trees and crops, with subsequent amendment affecting solatium and interest rates. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:13:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178171 Occupancy tenants are treated as entitled to compensation against the zamindar in land acquisition matters, and the note applies that precedent to reject the contrary State argument. It also explains that a claimant need not state a separate amount for each sub-head of compensation in a Section 9 objection, so omission of itemwise figures does not prevent an award. The discussion further notes that a claim may be pursued through Section 18 proceedings and that Section 25(3) supports compensation for fixtures, trees and crops, with subsequent amendment affecting solatium and interest rates. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178171