https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178171 Occupancy tenants are entitled to land-acquisition compensation against the Zamindar despite State ownership of the property. A claimant need not specify compensation separately for every sub-head in an objection under Section 9; omission does not prevent the Tribunal from awarding compensation for relevant items. Claims for fixtures, trees and crops may be pursued through applications under Section 18 even without revision of the Section 9 claim, with compensation determined under Section 25(3). The compensation award was sustained, while solatium and interest were increased in line with a subsequent amendment. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:13:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178171 Occupancy tenants are entitled to land-acquisition compensation against the Zamindar despite State ownership of the property. A claimant need not specify compensation separately for every sub-head in an objection under Section 9; omission does not prevent the Tribunal from awarding compensation for relevant items. Claims for fixtures, trees and crops may be pursued through applications under Section 18 even without revision of the Section 9 claim, with compensation determined under Section 25(3). The compensation award was sustained, while solatium and interest were increased in line with a subsequent amendment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178171