<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 957 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the reduced Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) value and affirmed the reduction of goodwill from the total IPR value. The issue of software development expenditure was restored to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation as per Special Bench guidelines. The appeals were partly allowed, providing a balanced resolution to the contested issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 957 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the reduced Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) value and affirmed the reduction of goodwill from the total IPR value. The issue of software development expenditure was restored to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation as per Special Bench guidelines. The appeals were partly allowed, providing a balanced resolution to the contested issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>