<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 42 -  HIGH COURT , GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2089</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the income received by the sub-partnership from the parent firm is exempt under Section 10(2A) of the Income-tax Act. It concluded that the sub-partnership should be deemed a partner in the main partnership to avoid double taxation. The court emphasized interpreting the provisions of the Act to prevent double taxation and align with legislative intent, setting aside the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 42 -  HIGH COURT , GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2089</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the income received by the sub-partnership from the parent firm is exempt under Section 10(2A) of the Income-tax Act. It concluded that the sub-partnership should be deemed a partner in the main partnership to avoid double taxation. The court emphasized interpreting the provisions of the Act to prevent double taxation and align with legislative intent, setting aside the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>