<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 121 -  HIGH COURT , MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2088</link>
    <description>The court held that unabsorbed business losses, depreciation, and investment allowance must be considered in computing income for section 80HHC deduction. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating these amounts should not be excluded before granting the deduction. The decision overturned the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s ruling, answering both issues negatively against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 121 -  HIGH COURT , MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2088</link>
      <description>The court held that unabsorbed business losses, depreciation, and investment allowance must be considered in computing income for section 80HHC deduction. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating these amounts should not be excluded before granting the deduction. The decision overturned the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s ruling, answering both issues negatively against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>