<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 625 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the order under sec. 263 by the Learned Commissioner. It held that the AO&#039;s discontinuation of reassessment proceedings did not warrant corrective action under sec. 263 as it was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The appeal of the assessee was partially allowed, emphasizing that the Learned Commissioner&#039;s intervention was unwarranted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 625 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the order under sec. 263 by the Learned Commissioner. It held that the AO&#039;s discontinuation of reassessment proceedings did not warrant corrective action under sec. 263 as it was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The appeal of the assessee was partially allowed, emphasizing that the Learned Commissioner&#039;s intervention was unwarranted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>