<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 982 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Rs. 1 crore received by the assessee on transferring the trademark was a capital receipt not taxable under section 45 read with section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal, as there were no grounds for levying the penalty. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:04:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 982 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Rs. 1 crore received by the assessee on transferring the trademark was a capital receipt not taxable under section 45 read with section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal, as there were no grounds for levying the penalty. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>