<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 980 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded its jurisdiction by initiating and levying penalty under section 271(1)(c) on additional income not penalized by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s penalty order. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings must be initiated by the assessing authority, and the CIT(A) cannot impose penalties independently during appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 980 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded its jurisdiction by initiating and levying penalty under section 271(1)(c) on additional income not penalized by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s penalty order. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings must be initiated by the assessing authority, and the CIT(A) cannot impose penalties independently during appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>