<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 973 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271181</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the service provided as an intermediary for the postal department was revenue neutral. The demand for service tax was dropped as the services were considered input services for the postal department, allowing for Cenvat credit. The tribunal emphasized the principle of revenue neutrality, citing previous judgments to support the decision. The demand for service tax was deemed invalid due to the concept of avoiding double taxation, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 973 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271181</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the service provided as an intermediary for the postal department was revenue neutral. The demand for service tax was dropped as the services were considered input services for the postal department, allowing for Cenvat credit. The tribunal emphasized the principle of revenue neutrality, citing previous judgments to support the decision. The demand for service tax was deemed invalid due to the concept of avoiding double taxation, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>