https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271168 The Court set aside the order of CESTAT, condoned the delay of 217 days, and remitted the matter back to CESTAT for a hearing on the merits of the case. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of justice and providing the appellant with an opportunity to contest the case on its merits. The Court found that the reasons provided by CESTAT for dismissing the application for condonation of delay were insufficient in the eye of the law and highlighted the need for a justice-oriented approach in legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271168 The Court set aside the order of CESTAT, condoned the delay of 217 days, and remitted the matter back to CESTAT for a hearing on the merits of the case. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of justice and providing the appellant with an opportunity to contest the case on its merits. The Court found that the reasons provided by CESTAT for dismissing the application for condonation of delay were insufficient in the eye of the law and highlighted the need for a justice-oriented approach in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271168