https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271160 For a corporate plaintiff, territorial jurisdiction under Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act depends on a real business presence at the forum, read with Section 20 CPC. Mere access to a website or internet transactions in Delhi does not by itself mean the company "carries on business" there if it has no principal, registered, head, or branch office in the jurisdiction. On that basis, the Delhi forum was not available on the pleaded facts, and the plaints were returned for presentation before the proper court under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. en-us Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:00:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271160 For a corporate plaintiff, territorial jurisdiction under Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act depends on a real business presence at the forum, read with Section 20 CPC. Mere access to a website or internet transactions in Delhi does not by itself mean the company "carries on business" there if it has no principal, registered, head, or branch office in the jurisdiction. On that basis, the Delhi forum was not available on the pleaded facts, and the plaints were returned for presentation before the proper court under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271160