https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178122 A special leave petition confined to challenging the order rejecting review, without assailing the main judgment, was held not maintainable. The Court applied the principle that a review-rejection order cannot be attacked in isolation when the underlying judgment remains unchallenged. The petitioner's reliance on an exception failed because the cited earlier decision had not considered binding precedents on the point and was treated as per incuriam. The preliminary objection to maintainability was accepted, and the petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178122 A special leave petition confined to challenging the order rejecting review, without assailing the main judgment, was held not maintainable. The Court applied the principle that a review-rejection order cannot be attacked in isolation when the underlying judgment remains unchallenged. The petitioner's reliance on an exception failed because the cited earlier decision had not considered binding precedents on the point and was treated as per incuriam. The preliminary objection to maintainability was accepted, and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178122