https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178120 Article 136 special leave jurisdiction was not excluded by the finality attached to election tribunal decisions or by Article 329(b), because the Supreme Court's constitutional power cannot be curtailed by ordinary legislation and extends to judicial tribunals. In election challenges, a concealed constitutional age disqualification does not amount to improper acceptance of nomination where the nomination paper and electoral roll disclose no defect and no objection is raised at scrutiny; that situation is treated as non-compliance with the Constitution under Section 100(2)(c), not as improper acceptance under Section 100(1)(c). The underage returned candidate's election was therefore void, while the other candidate's return remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 19 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:48:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178120 Article 136 special leave jurisdiction was not excluded by the finality attached to election tribunal decisions or by Article 329(b), because the Supreme Court's constitutional power cannot be curtailed by ordinary legislation and extends to judicial tribunals. In election challenges, a concealed constitutional age disqualification does not amount to improper acceptance of nomination where the nomination paper and electoral roll disclose no defect and no objection is raised at scrutiny; that situation is treated as non-compliance with the Constitution under Section 100(2)(c), not as improper acceptance under Section 100(1)(c). The underage returned candidate's election was therefore void, while the other candidate's return remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178120