https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178119 A review petition filed before a later special leave petition was not barred by the subsequent withdrawal of that petition, because the sequence of proceedings did not attract res judicata or similar objection. The Court also held that review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC can be justified where the record shows material errors and overlooked evidence causing injustice. Here, the High Court had failed to properly consider valuation material, comparable acquisitions, and reassessment of compensation for tea bushes, so its refusal to review was unsustainable. The judgment under challenge was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal. en-us Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178119 A review petition filed before a later special leave petition was not barred by the subsequent withdrawal of that petition, because the sequence of proceedings did not attract res judicata or similar objection. The Court also held that review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC can be justified where the record shows material errors and overlooked evidence causing injustice. Here, the High Court had failed to properly consider valuation material, comparable acquisitions, and reassessment of compensation for tea bushes, so its refusal to review was unsustainable. The judgment under challenge was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178119