<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 890 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178116</link>
    <description>A concluded compensation order could not be reopened in later proceedings where the earlier challenge had been withdrawn without liberty to contest the merits, and the prior appellate order had attained finality. The Court also found no basis to interfere with the claimant&#039;s categorisation under the compensation scheme, because the medical material had already been considered and compensation had been enhanced, with no proof of entitlement to a higher category. The appeal therefore failed and the compensation award remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 890 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178116</link>
      <description>A concluded compensation order could not be reopened in later proceedings where the earlier challenge had been withdrawn without liberty to contest the merits, and the prior appellate order had attained finality. The Court also found no basis to interfere with the claimant&#039;s categorisation under the compensation scheme, because the medical material had already been considered and compensation had been enhanced, with no proof of entitlement to a higher category. The appeal therefore failed and the compensation award remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>