https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178115 A coordinate bench cannot reopen a final determination of an earlier coordinate bench on the same service-law issue, and judicial discipline requires adherence to that earlier ruling. On that basis, the retrospective regularisation of the temporary services of the Andhra Engineers was treated as valid, and the gradation lists prepared on that footing could not be invalidated merely by a later differing view. The court also held that a tribunal cannot straightaway direct pro forma promotions with consequential monetary benefits and interest, because retrospective promotion is not an absolute right and such relief exceeded the limits of service-law jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed and the connected applications were dismissed. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:24:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178115 A coordinate bench cannot reopen a final determination of an earlier coordinate bench on the same service-law issue, and judicial discipline requires adherence to that earlier ruling. On that basis, the retrospective regularisation of the temporary services of the Andhra Engineers was treated as valid, and the gradation lists prepared on that footing could not be invalidated merely by a later differing view. The court also held that a tribunal cannot straightaway direct pro forma promotions with consequential monetary benefits and interest, because retrospective promotion is not an absolute right and such relief exceeded the limits of service-law jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed and the connected applications were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178115