<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Upheld for Not Informing Department About Adjusting Excess Service Tax Paid Against Future Liabilities, Section 77 Applied.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27099</link>
    <description>Self adjustment of excess service tax paid towards payment of service tax during the subsequent period - appellants had not intimated the said adjustment to the department - Demand of duty and penalty set aside - levy of penalty of &amp;#8377; 5,000/- u/s 77 upheld - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:45:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Upheld for Not Informing Department About Adjusting Excess Service Tax Paid Against Future Liabilities, Section 77 Applied.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27099</link>
      <description>Self adjustment of excess service tax paid towards payment of service tax during the subsequent period - appellants had not intimated the said adjustment to the department - Demand of duty and penalty set aside - levy of penalty of &amp;#8377; 5,000/- u/s 77 upheld - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:45:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>