<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 94 - ITAT, JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of the VRS amount as capital expenditure and directing a review of interest charged under section 234B. The Tribunal emphasized the nature of the expenditure, rejected the circular&#039;s applicability, and disregarded section 35DDA for the deduction, ensuring the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the full VRS amount deduction for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 94 - ITAT, JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of the VRS amount as capital expenditure and directing a review of interest charged under section 234B. The Tribunal emphasized the nature of the expenditure, rejected the circular&#039;s applicability, and disregarded section 35DDA for the deduction, ensuring the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the full VRS amount deduction for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>