<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 947 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271155</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act as the reassessment proceedings were found invalid due to the absence of failure to disclose material facts and being initiated based on a change of opinion. The court affirmed that the petitioner had fully disclosed all necessary facts and that the dividend income earned was exempt from tax under Section 10(33) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 947 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271155</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act as the reassessment proceedings were found invalid due to the absence of failure to disclose material facts and being initiated based on a change of opinion. The court affirmed that the petitioner had fully disclosed all necessary facts and that the dividend income earned was exempt from tax under Section 10(33) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>