<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 932 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the final order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to being beyond the prescribed period of limitation. As a result, the Tribunal did not delve into the other issues raised by the appellant. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and any stay, if granted, was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 932 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the final order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to being beyond the prescribed period of limitation. As a result, the Tribunal did not delve into the other issues raised by the appellant. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and any stay, if granted, was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>