https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271134 Where an efficacious statutory appeal was available, the writ court directed the assessee to pursue that remedy and preserved the right to contest limitation before the Tribunal. The court did not decide the delay dispute on merits; it left the question of timely filing open for the appellate forum. The assessee was permitted to file the appeal subject to the statutory pre-deposit requirement, thereby keeping the substantive appellate remedy alive while requiring compliance with the condition precedent. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271134 Where an efficacious statutory appeal was available, the writ court directed the assessee to pursue that remedy and preserved the right to contest limitation before the Tribunal. The court did not decide the delay dispute on merits; it left the question of timely filing open for the appellate forum. The assessee was permitted to file the appeal subject to the statutory pre-deposit requirement, thereby keeping the substantive appellate remedy alive while requiring compliance with the condition precedent. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271134