<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 917 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271125</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that steel items used in the fabrication of capital goods were eligible for cenvat credit. The decision emphasized the importance of the user test and specific categorization of items under the Central Excise tariff and Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 917 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271125</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that steel items used in the fabrication of capital goods were eligible for cenvat credit. The decision emphasized the importance of the user test and specific categorization of items under the Central Excise tariff and Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>