<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1696 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. It allowed the claims for depreciation on intangible assets and classification of Held to Maturity (HTM) securities as stock-in-trade. However, it dismissed claims for loss of investment, provision for standard assets, and the alternative claim for premium on securities. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s position on the application of Section 43D for bad and doubtful debts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1696 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. It allowed the claims for depreciation on intangible assets and classification of Held to Maturity (HTM) securities as stock-in-trade. However, it dismissed claims for loss of investment, provision for standard assets, and the alternative claim for premium on securities. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s position on the application of Section 43D for bad and doubtful debts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>