<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1100 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178075</link>
    <description>For section 2(47)(v), transfer in a development arrangement arises only when possession is given in part performance of a contract satisfying section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act; where possession is conditional and actual handover occurs later, the transfer date is the date of actual possession, making the later investment eligible for section 54EC relief. Alternate accommodation provided under a composite development arrangement was to be examined as part of the overall consideration and not as a separate receipt. The section 14A disallowance was sustained because the recorded basis for attributing expenditure to exempt income was found adequate, and the rule 8D adjustment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1100 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178075</link>
      <description>For section 2(47)(v), transfer in a development arrangement arises only when possession is given in part performance of a contract satisfying section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act; where possession is conditional and actual handover occurs later, the transfer date is the date of actual possession, making the later investment eligible for section 54EC relief. Alternate accommodation provided under a composite development arrangement was to be examined as part of the overall consideration and not as a separate receipt. The section 14A disallowance was sustained because the recorded basis for attributing expenditure to exempt income was found adequate, and the rule 8D adjustment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>