<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1019 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of the excess duty paid due to duty payment without an order of adjudication and in ignorance of a notification allowing concessional duty rates. The assessing authority was directed to disburse the refund within a specified timeframe. The ruling emphasized the duty of the assessing authority to extend benefits under notifications to the assessee, even if not initially claimed, and highlighted the validity of refund claims in cases of duty paid without adjudication orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:21:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1019 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of the excess duty paid due to duty payment without an order of adjudication and in ignorance of a notification allowing concessional duty rates. The assessing authority was directed to disburse the refund within a specified timeframe. The ruling emphasized the duty of the assessing authority to extend benefits under notifications to the assessee, even if not initially claimed, and highlighted the validity of refund claims in cases of duty paid without adjudication orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>