<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 106 -  HIGH COURT , DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2056</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the appeal and stating that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Court upheld the allowance of interest payable by the Assessee, deletion of the addition of Rs.30 lacs for land value, deletion of Rs.2 lacs for car parking space, and rejection of the addition of Rs.4.57 lacs for diversion of income in the sale of a flat.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 106 -  HIGH COURT , DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2056</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the appeal and stating that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Court upheld the allowance of interest payable by the Assessee, deletion of the addition of Rs.30 lacs for land value, deletion of Rs.2 lacs for car parking space, and rejection of the addition of Rs.4.57 lacs for diversion of income in the sale of a flat.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>