<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 864 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of addition on account of alleged bogus purchases for Assessment Year 2007-08. The CIT(A) found that the purchases were supported by proper documentation, recorded in the books of account, and entered in the stock register. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the significance of maintaining accurate records to substantiate transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:12:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 864 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of addition on account of alleged bogus purchases for Assessment Year 2007-08. The CIT(A) found that the purchases were supported by proper documentation, recorded in the books of account, and entered in the stock register. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the significance of maintaining accurate records to substantiate transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>