<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 621 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178063</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision in favor of the assessee company, emphasizing the legality and appropriateness of the project completion method in revenue recognition for property development businesses. The ITAT highlighted the importance of consistency in accounting practices and referenced legal precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s method of accounting. The judgment focused on the proper application of accounting standards, particularly distinguishing between real estate developers and construction contractors, ultimately dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue and affirming the assessee&#039;s revenue recognition approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 621 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178063</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision in favor of the assessee company, emphasizing the legality and appropriateness of the project completion method in revenue recognition for property development businesses. The ITAT highlighted the importance of consistency in accounting practices and referenced legal precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s method of accounting. The judgment focused on the proper application of accounting standards, particularly distinguishing between real estate developers and construction contractors, ultimately dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue and affirming the assessee&#039;s revenue recognition approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>